This website is only for informational purposes. Visitors are requested to note that the information is intended to be correct, complete, and up-to-date. Juris Corp does not warrant that the information contained on this website is accurate or complete, and disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause.

This website is not intended to be a source of advertising or solicitation. The reader must not consider the information contained herein to be an invitation for a lawyer-client relationship, must not rely on information provided herein and must seek independent advice. Transmission, receipt or use of any information on this website does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship. No recipients of content from this website should act or refrain from acting, based upon any or all of the contents of this website.

Furthermore, Juris Corp does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based solely upon viewing this web site. Finally, the reader is warned that the use of e-mail for confidential or sensitive information is susceptible to inherent risks of lack of confidentiality associated with sending e-mail over the internet.

By clicking on the "I understand and agree" button below, the user acknowledges that:

  • This website is not a mode of advertisement, promotion, personal communication, or solicitation of any sort whatsoever and the user wishes to gain information about us for his/her own reasons;
  • Entering into this website does not establish a lawyer-client relationship.

We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she must seek independent legal advice.

JC - Legal Updates - Secured creditors dues placed higher than government dues even when having a statutory charge – ‘Rainbow-Papers’ clarified!

Legal Updates

20 Jul 2023

Secured creditors dues placed higher than government dues even when having a statutory charge – ‘Rainbow-Papers’ clarified!

Section 238 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) overrides the provisions of the Electricity Act and that the dues payable to secured creditors are at a higher footing than the dues covered by a statutory charge i.e., payable to the State.
See Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd vs Raman Ispat Private Limited (Civil Appeal Nos. 7976 of 2019). Additionally, the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“Supreme Court”) also effectively distinguished Rainbow Papers [2023 INSC 625] 
Technical Details:

1.   Supreme Court while placing substantial emphasis on the 'waterfall mechanism' under Section 53 of the IBC observed that the provision prioritizes the payment of dues to secured creditors who relinquish the right to enforce security when the liquidation process is initiated. The payment of such creditors is second only to the payment of insolvency resolution process costs and liquidation costs.

Also the SC held that government debts are at a lower priority than the debts owed to unsecured financial creditors and government debts include debts covered by a statutory charge. In other words, the lower priority of government debts also extends to secured government debt.

It was further held that the claims of an Electricity Company (“EC”) cannot be treated as government debt on the grounds of the EC having government participation. It was also noted that not all dues owed under a statute are treated as ‘government dues.’ 
JC Key Takeaways:
Creditors under the IBC, both secured and unsecured, are entitled to have their debts repaid first before dues payable to the State or the Central governments are settled. Further Rainbow Papers judgement does not deal with dues of the State in a Liquidation Proceedings and fails to recognize the waterfall mechanism, further that not all dues owed under the statute are considered 'government dues' as defined by Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
For further details, please see:


For any queries/clarifications, please feel free to ping us and we will be happy to chat:

●   Mr. Jayesh H (jayesh.h@jclex.com)

●   Ms. Palak Nenwani (palak.nenwani@jclex.com)