This website is only for informational purposes. Visitors are requested to note that the information is intended to be correct, complete, and up-to-date. Juris Corp does not warrant that the information contained on this website is accurate or complete, and disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause.

This website is not intended to be a source of advertising or solicitation. The reader must not consider the information contained herein to be an invitation for a lawyer-client relationship, must not rely on information provided herein and must seek independent advice. Transmission, receipt or use of any information on this website does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship. No recipients of content from this website should act or refrain from acting, based upon any or all of the contents of this website.

Furthermore, Juris Corp does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based solely upon viewing this web site. Finally, the reader is warned that the use of e-mail for confidential or sensitive information is susceptible to inherent risks of lack of confidentiality associated with sending e-mail over the internet.

By clicking on the "I understand and agree" button below, the user acknowledges that:

  • This website is not a mode of advertisement, promotion, personal communication, or solicitation of any sort whatsoever and the user wishes to gain information about us for his/her own reasons;
  • Entering into this website does not establish a lawyer-client relationship.

We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she must seek independent legal advice.

JC - Insights - Stamp Duty Saga - Section 30-A of Maharashtra Stamp Act


13 May 2016

Stamp Duty Saga - Section 30-A of Maharashtra Stamp Act

As the banking system continues to deal with the increase in defaults, it becomes imperative and puts the spotlight back on the underlying documentation to be used for enforcement. It is common knowledge that bank and financial institutions are mindful as to whether a document through which their rights flow are adequately stamped or not. Stamp duty (or stamp tax) plays a significant role in determining the structuring of a transaction and therefore the nature of document to be executed. Being a state subject, significant time also gets expended in evaluating the stamp friendly jurisdiction and establishing nexus for execution in that state. Even at the time of recovery and enforcement, the issue of enforceability and admissibility of a particular document hinges, inter alia, on whether the document has been properly and adequately stamped.

Insertion of Section 30-A to the Maharashtra Stamp Act (“Mah Stamp Act”) vide an amendment in May 2013 created a lot of noise in the industry. Section 30-A makes banks, non-banking financial companies, housing finance companies and such other financial institutions (“Banks/FIs”) liable to:

(a) pay proper stamp duty on instruments mentioned under Section 30 (a) to (g) of the Mah Stamp Act executed by it or in its favour;
(b) verify that adequate stamp duty has been paid on instruments executed prior to the amendment;
(c) impound the instruments falling under a) and b) on which proper stamp duty has not been paid and send the same to the relevant Collector of Stamps (“Collector”) for recovery; and
(d) pay penalty for failure to impound the instruments as mentioned under c) above.

Know more by clicking the \'Download Report\' button below.